Quote:
Originally Posted by herr_oberst
If this is the case, wouldn't it be easy enough to use a reverse generator or something to create a detector for teachers to check for AI essays?
(Actually, it seems to me that from what I read online these days, if an essay uses correct spelling on all the words, that would be a big red flag if I was grading papers...or looking for plagiarism if I were an editor)
|
Ya, so it really does mostly work like I said. Problem of reverse:
- it doesn’t give a number, it gives a range of numbers with probabilities, and next word is selected from that at random.
- generated words depend on prior input, including user input. New model is limited to input of about 400 pages of text…
- reverse is like crypto, you need the question to generate a matching answer, but also need matching random word choice.
I don’t know solution, would be healthy if there was something in the result that made it recognizable, but there’s nothing today. Maybe require all answers as dirty limericks? Maybe there’s a way to test text directly against the model and find a correlation.
What is confounding to me is how word correlation is enough to make it work so well. Instead of praising ai advance I am falling out of love with our tiny chimp brains. Boo hoo for humanity.