Quote:
Originally Posted by zakthor
Ya, so it really does mostly work like I said. Problem of reverse:
- it doesn’t give a number, it gives a range of numbers with probabilities, and next word is selected from that at random.
- generated words depend on prior input, including user input. New model is limited to input of about 400 pages of text…
- reverse is like crypto, you need the question to generate a matching answer, but also need matching random word choice.
I don’t know solution, would be healthy if there was something in the result that made it recognizable, but there’s nothing today. Maybe require all answers as dirty limericks? Maybe there’s a way to test text directly against the model and find a correlation.
What is confounding to me is how word correlation is enough to make it work so well. Instead of praising ai advance I am falling out of love with our tiny chimp brains. Boo hoo for humanity.
|
Agreed on that last point! I have no clue as to the tech, but I would have imagined it was a lot more complex than what you are describing. In one example, the AI actually reached out to a human and got it to solve a CAPTCHA for it so it could continue it’s task! How is that happening without a little more “intelligence” than just word matching?
__________________
1957 Speedster, 1965 356SC, 1965 356SC Outlaw, 1972 911T, 1998 993 C2S, 2018 Targa 4 GTS, 2014 Cayenne S, 2016 Boxster Spyder, 2025 Ranger Raptor
|