|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,752
|
Flatbutt's "miscellaneous stuff" thread actually has a quite a few posts on the launch including this post that I thought was excellent:
Quote:
Originally Posted by porschedude996
I have a little different spin on the launch. I grew up by Vandenberg Air Force Base, now Vandenberg Space Force Base, and spent most of my life well informed about early missile launches. My father was employed by Lockheed at the base as a propellant engineer beginning in 1957-1958 and at some point a Site Manager with four launch pads. I entered into the biz working space shuttle after 8 years working aircraft manufacturing and flight test and field engineering before I worked space shuttle. After that went away on the west coast, I worked NRO Payloads as a design engineer. So since the first attempts to get to into space, from 1957 to 2014, i’ve been very familiar with space launch and development.
I can tell you that you just don’t get a perfect mission and one needs to learn to crawl before you walk, and then walk well before you run. It cannot be compared to any other mode of transportation development and the huge risks at any event. I see nothing at fault or going off track of a new flight vehicle. The three representatives were a bit over the top with their development failure commentary, but in this goofy social networking age, the uninformed information written by people that can’t find their gluts, need to bow out. No offense to those here on the forum.
My son works for SpaceX at VSFB on the Falon vehicles, so he’s a third generation missile enthusiast.
So other than the comments, the joyful exuberance, and the Rapid Disassembly comment, everything thing is normal during this development phase.
|
__________________
Steve
'08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960
- never named a car before, but this is Charlotte.
'88 targa  SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
|
04-20-2023, 10:36 AM
|
|