Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Carlton
I've only been posting on this thread when something new comes up or replying to responses, such as some from Higgins. Are you objecting to that?
Are you implying that the gun may have been altered after the event or that adversaries have been influenced by AB's team? Shouldn't something along those lines be posted if such accusations come up?
|
What I am implying is that given any reason to challenge procedure before getting to the actual events that took place is going to be exploited. And if there has been any background activity that has managed to skirt witness tampering, then it may have taken place.
Those involved in legal representation (I could not think of the word I wanted to use there) don't play nice. And money does what these people need it to do.
Baldwin Settles
(that's just a reminder)