Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric 951
seems it is based upon the experiences of the "burners" to whom craigster spoke.
|
see, this is declarative of the experience of a burn.
my statement is still not.
this is junior high level logic guys. lets keep it together and not trainwreck another thread based on failure to understand junior high logic. i can say a million sentences about what something isnt ... and thats not the same as a single sentence saying what something is. this is why the no true Scotsman fallacy exists and is so commonly used, because there are infinite statements available as to what something isnt. there are only a limited number of statements of what something is.