|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas YEEHAW
Posts: 5,500
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by masraum
Was the "not guilty" because it was self defense or because a Texas judge figured any Texan using 22 didn't really mean to hurt the guy that badly.
"You used a 22? I guess you were just tryin' ta warn him off, not hurt 'em and definitely not kill 'em or you'd ah used something startin' with a '4' or endin' with 'magnum'."
|
Jury verdict...
BTW, the defendant was retired Green Beret. Now we know how uses a .22
https://www.pleasantonexpress.com/articles/garza-found-not-guilty-in-shooting-death/
__________________
Matthew - drove Nurburgring with wipers on and no rain
1969 911E SOLD 
2002 996 Cabrio
1995 993 Carrera 4 SOLD
2004 Land Rover Discovery II G4 Edition (Sold  )
|