Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteKz
Henry, you probably have answered or proposed this before, but I doin't know what the right search terms would be find it:
I have a spare SC core engine collecting dust under my workbench. I have it "just in case" my current engine meets an untimely demise. If you were to start with that and build the no-holds-barred "ideal SC engine" what would you do?
|
"ideal SC engine" is a concept with no context. What I mean by that is there has to be a purpose in order for there to be an "ideal" set of specifications.
A perfect example of that is this little early engine. I would never suggest this engine for a home grown Singer replica. It seems a great compliment to a SWB 911 or maybe a 914/6 GT but 6 bolt valve covers and the early case are wasted on a project that isn't looking for the 60's aesthetics.
An SC core is a great place to start for so many different directives so I would want to know body style, driving style, road/track requirements and budget.
I would need to know if the customer is a Porsche fanatic or just an on-line Gysmo.
As I've mentioned over and over, the short stroke 2.8 is fun to drive but not more so than the 3.7 liter torque monster both of which can be built with the SC core. It's all a matter of driving expectations.
I love MFI but it is ridiculously impractical on many levels. Carbs are cheap, simple and effective but project a certain luddite image. EFI is all the rage but finding a tuner is a crap-shoot at best.
"Ideal for an SC build" is a conversation much like what are you looking for in the "ideal" woman. Looks cool when you take her out, performs well without being high strung, easy maintenance and decent throttle response in tight situations.