Quote:
Originally Posted by Seahawk
I have been on the phone all day talking this very thing. Swarm is actually easy, making the small UAS a threat isn't.
Swarm is real and is done now...the issues are interesting:
- The tyranny of distance. I write this all the time but most small UAS are battery powered with little endurance: So you will in many cases not get the swarm to the fight.
- UAS Control. We care, no one else does. The decision to engage is a constant issue.
- Logistics. "Thousands" of anything means a supply chain, especially if batteries and ordinance is on the table. Not easy and, as important, the other folks can be watching with intent...the Marines want zero supply problems, they want to make parts in the field.
- Payload. We have a Congressional plus-up for next year to arm one of our UAS. Again, most countries don't care, we have to where ordinance is concerned. The rules and guidance, especially if you are ship based, are very difficult. Small UAS have payload issues, sensor issues, comm issues.
Big world out there for UAS, especially commercially. Tether is the next wave and we are one it like Bazza.
|
What were the cons discussed for a C-130(s) to drop several armored boxes full of drones, no chutes for freefall, boxes open automatically at a particular height, drones swarm out and attack? A few engagements will dial in how and when they will be confronted by the enemy, and then drop and open heights can be modified.
It wouldn't be unrealistic to have to drop box itself have air to surface missiles to frustrate the enemy. Drone swarm plus infantry plus air support, timed in concert, seems like a winning strategy.
The supply chain, to me, is just a funding issue.
other issues are more complicated but can be worked out.