|
John,
Don't delete on my account. My problem is with BS that is out there, that has hurt people and is not challenged.
This flight should not have authorized. Ashby hadn't flown a low level in 13 months and thus considered to be unqualified ( 90 days for currency at the time and eligible for a currency flight if within 12 months). The squadron was under pressure to get their CRP (Combat Readiness Percentage) up. The biggest increase was from filling the jet with uncurrent aviators (no instructors) then authorizing a low level (500' agl) then down to LAT (Low Altitude Tactics, 200' agl). Both Ashby and the ASO questioned the flight as that was against T&R, NATOPS, etc. The CO used his authority to authorize the flight.
The career damages came not to the CO but others. All members of the Court who voted to acquit along with those dismissed by the prosecution at voire dire were passed for promotion (total of 19 Marines) despite all being PME complete and a number have multiple Fitreps as 1 of X placements against their peers. The LtCol. who brought this up had her career ended. Some of those passed were not allowed to resign but retained as essential for 2 extra years.
The 2,000' agl was a post mishap rule that had negative consequences with multiple hazreps sent to the Naval Safety Center but removed.
That the Prowler made it back is amazing after looking at the cable strike in the wing. I know it was put on a ship back to CONUS but do not know it was repaired or struck.
The only one I knew well was the ASO as he sat next to me at the Monterey ASO school for three months. The others only mass briefs or a bar.
S/F, FOG
|