Quote:
Originally Posted by dlockhart
|
Thanks for posting that. I agree with what was said. He’s using established terminology incorrectly. Howard is using geometric shapes and symmetry to solve certain systems. In chemistry, valence bond theory would be the equivalent to what he is doing, which is higher level of pattern recognition in 3D. Howard is also relying on assumptions that should not be made. He would be an asset in any research group as he poses a unique perspective that not many formal researchers ever venture into.