Quote:
Originally Posted by AlBackus36
Can we talk about the 3.2 cross bar and console again? Is the top of it at a different height than the 3.6 cross bar? Anyone ever measured the difference? What is stopping someone from simply removing the spacers and lifting the aft end up the 1.25 inches the spacers force it down? This has been bugging me.
|
The 3.6 tin is sized to complement the lower position of the egine, both the tin and mount prevent a higher . ie stock engine position.
3.6 mount & tin
3.2 mount & Sheridan f/g
w/ a vram a modified package tray is more desirable than the droopy drawer ghetto look
which can be ameliorated w/ a custom, read expensive, exhaust setup.
just my opinion but since I've had 964, 993 vram & 993 non vram the 993 non vram is the best compliment to the 915 and early chassis. The vram has what I call a Camel hump torque curve, the cammed n-vram is more like a pouncing tiger. You really don't miss the lower rpm vram torque, and you can appreciate the higher rpm tiger torque curve. a 3.8RS is very hard on the 915 in the lower gears.