Quote:
Originally Posted by ramonesfreak
I liked that scene.
I like the son character. Cant stand the widow girlfriend..horrible actor and character...whenever those two are on screen I yell at the TV, "get the hell away from her kid!"
The old man lawyer that lives with them is also funny. The woman lawyer is vile. In almost 30 years of working as a lawyer I have never encountered anyone as ridiculous as her...even working in the bowels of NYC. Totally phony and over the top.
The ex-wife...the series would have been just fine without that annoying character.
The college interview scene with the daughter did make me laugh but I think that is the only time I have laughed.
I know its "just a movie" but I find myself yelling alot when it is on
I think I am not cut out for these soap opera type series. Thats basically all they are to me.
I have enjoyed Slow Horses but this past season sucked I thought. Hopefully next season it will pick up
|
I'm not even sure whether this is S3 or just the 2nd season, but after last year's series, which I seemed to have to watch to the end, was enough for me. I have to agree with your assessments. In my case it's don't waste the time.
If this is only the 2nd season that tells me enough about S1, just too much. Taylor Sheridan has written some interesting shows but it's all cookie cutter once you've been through one of his series. Modern "Dallas" which sprang forth its own set of copies like the grape grower "Falcon Crest."
They are Soap Operas, nothing more. Interestingly, George Lucas has been given credit for developing the 3 stories in 1 format used commonly since. This was a main criticism when he and Coppola shopped American Graffiti around to the various studios in '72. I guess the studios thought it was too complicated for wide spread success.
Look at us now.