[dd74]

To address Glenn's earlier question about which man, Kerry or Bush would a Dem or "independent" rather have leading the war on terror, I'd say, speaking from more of an independent positioning, that Bush is the man for that conflict.

Gore would have vascillated tremendously after 9/11, and half-do the dirty work in Afghanistan akin to the half-measured taken by Clinton against Iraq. And yet, this doesn't preclude that Iraq is the correct place to go looking for terrorism, either.

Today's al Queda update came courtesy of the top rag-a-muffin himself, Osama. It states all the bad things he's going to do to the U.S. and anyone who supports our country's efforts. Now, to me, that makes him a prime threat, and if Bush were to go after him with every single soldier in the Iraqi theater of the war on terror, I'd support this president whole-heartedly. Hell, I might even vote for the man.

Bin Laden's the threat - not Iraq. Bin Laden, not Iraq.