Quote:
Originally posted by island911
So you, also, want to turn what the commision is about (PRE-9/11 EVENTS) and change it into POST-9/11 events ?
That is the f'd-up FLACK i'm talking about.
|
No, not at all. I'm really not that interested in any conclusion the 9/11 Commission comes to. 9/11 already happened; it's past tense.
As far as POST-9/11 events resulting from PRE-9/11 events, I leave that "history" to Bob Woodward and John Dean. Bush et al created that own quagmire for themselves and successive presidents to clean up.
My own desire is to figure out why these two had to testify together (and flint - the word is "testify:" even the White House is using it). Why the secrecy? Why can't the White House even be able to record the conversation? Are they afraid of a Nixon relapse?
I think Bush/Cheney and even Clinton are scared of their own knowledge, lack thereof, or poor judgment and misguided attention to other concerns (Bush and Iraq).
If at all, Bush/Cheney should be afraid of the "leaks" that will mysteriously pop up from their little private talk today.