I don't know which P.O.ed me the most. The fact that a pedophile escapes punishment because of the statute of limitations, or the way the OREGONIAN covered and editorialized the story. This is the same paper that crucified then Senator Packwood for getting smashed on wine, hitting on
adult women, most of whom turned him down. If they said no, he backed off. Boorish behavior to be sure. But THE OREGONIAN kept the pressure on until he resigned from the Senate, and moved out of the state. Packwood was a "moderate" (read liberal) Republican. Goldschmidt has admitted to the felony of statutory rape. But THE OREGONIAN insists on using the words "affair" or "relationship" to describe his pedophilia? Goldschmidt is about as far left as they come in the Democrat party, always for more taxes, government, and more regulations hampering business....and knew well how to advance these goals. Therefore, they editorialize softly, calling him brilliant, blah-blah-woof-woof, and are "saddened" by his "mistake". How these people can claim to be neutral in their reporting is beyond my limited ability to understand....
