[fintstone]

Originally posted by Neilk
First off I meant accomplishments.

Let's see... General and commander-in-chief of the United States Central Command. I think that should be enough.

But see, there you go again. Any time anyone has anything bad to say about the administration, you start questioning what they have done in the past. That is the MO of the administration. Attack someone to draw attention from yourself.

Why is Zinni's opinion any better than that of the current commander of Central Command ...or Powell or any other past hundreds of commanders of a combined or unified command? The only difference is that he was the leader of Central Command under Clinton...when we did not go after the Taliban or Saddam. You don't hear him whining about why we didn't go after Bin Laden when he was in charge of the middle east. Of course he is POed that his replacement, Tommy Franks, got the job done.

Zini is the one making the attacks...not me. I just have to laugh that his word is golden among liberals....just because he was a general once. LOL. I have worked very closely with lots of generals that were great golfers...but didn'y have a clue about much else. Lots of politics for any rank over O-5. You like him simply because you agree with him.