Quote:
Originally posted by 84porsche
He may look guilty but a jury of his peers said he was innocent. I don't think he killed them but I think he may have had something to do with it.
|
He might have just been watching very closely. That would explain OJ's blood at the crime scene and the victims blood in OJ's car, on his socks, in his house. I'm sure it was just an amazing coincidence.
And what's the fuss about this DNA stuff all about? It's not like a fingerprint, right?