[techweenie]

osland 911: "Is that more of your side of the debate, Super? . .Some ambiguous, non-responsive drivil .. .supposedly to lift your status to judge(who means well, of course), and subtley suggest your opposition is way past the pale.. . . ? (is that tough to do?

Exactly my comment about Mul's 2-line response. The economy is booming? Where?How?

Clinton's military victorious in Afghanistan? Of course it was. He didn't even try to deny it. Just made some foolish comment.

So I guess you only criticize responses when they don't agree with your prejudices... or are you, like the majoriity of others here, simply ignoring Mul?