Quote:
Originally posted by Mulholland
I don't seek to validate myself, I seek to inform with accurate reporting to allow people to see the abject emptiness of the Democrat platform and strategery...If you are asking what my thoughts are (as opposed to your question being rhetorical), I will reveal it in what I report...It is way too cumbersome to strike out on a discourse following each point I intend to make. Brevity is the soul of wit after all.
|
I completely agree with you that the Democratic party is BK morally and intellectually...they are still stuck back with New Deal ideology. Times have changed, people have moved on and recognize how BK the Democartic party is, and thats why they are outa power. They are absolutely desperate to regain their position at the trough...thats why they are leaning so far to the left this time out with Kerry. Further I believe it was a done deal among the power brokers in the Democratic Party that Dean wasn't going to be the horse they were going to bet on. Look where the power shifted to after 2002....radical left....Nancy Pellossi, Teddy Kennedy wing of the party...Kerry is BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY Teddy....(the moderate Clinton wing failed in 2000 and 2002 to get the votes).
Validation huh? OK....I'll take it....good one....Sometimes by just reporting it is hard to know if you agree or disagree with the quotee. As an aside when I have a problem I consult with my friends, I generally know what each one is going to say...yet what I want to know is the reasoning...the why of their position. What do they see that I might not. Thats INFORMATIVE. Now with regards to Brevity..yup can't say enough about the one liner to the heart....but sometimes it needs setting up.
One other thing bout me...when I write something I know there are 3 positions or responses that can be made to me...I know what my response is going to be to each of those positions before I post.