[Moneyguy1]

To be fair, this country is in the middle of a very messy international situation. For any opponent of the administration to come out too strongly at this point about the perceived weaknesses of those at the helm could have the perceived effect of undermining any efforts at stabilization and backfire.

Whether the Dems or the Reps were at the helm, the situation would be the same. So, the opposition has to tread carefully re: major criticism at this juncture.

Also, the Convention has yet to officially nominate Kerry. Once that is done, and the candidates are clearly defined, I am certain that the rhetoric on the Democratic side will become more defined itself.

I also expect more personal attacks from the administration, moreso than from the opposition. That seems to be the pattern so far. From an independent's point of view, the current "ins" have little to run on, given the agreed upon fact that Presidents have little effect on the economy, but take credit for it, and the current attitude of most of the world, right or wrong, toward our efforts at providing security.

I would guess that, other than domestic issues which have to be addressed, one focus will be on the perceived inability of the administration to successfully use diplomacy in dealing with the rest of the world. Note I said perceived.

As far as the economy, one must ask what can be done to improve health care and the need for meaningful jobs. To the average citizen, these are paramount. Many people do not realize that, for a retired couple, if the retiree dies, medical coverage for the surviving spouse often ends, leaving the individual without at that time in their lives when they may need it the most. And, Medicare just doesn't cover much of the costs. As far as jobs, those fortunate enough to have a good paying job in many industries are constantly looking over their shoulders, fearing the worst. And, those in small businesses depend on the disposable income of others in order to continue in business. The so-called "top 1%" does NOT include small business owners as stated by some. Most of that group are coupon clippers, taxed at the new low rate for monies invested rather than earned. The small business person is currently taxed rather highly.

On a personal note, although in favor of removing Saddam and keeping the promise to the Iraquis by GHWB, I do think that a little more time could have been used to convince others of the need for our actions. But, since we are there, it must be seen through to its logical conclusion, no matter what that may ultimately be. GHWB in his book plainly pointed out the results of invasion that, as far as Iraq, "We would own it", with all the inherited problems.

My remaining problem as to my vote in November is whether some one else should be given a chance or whether we, as a nation, should force GWB to finish what he started and take responsibility for the results.