[Superman]

What Bush did was to cut taxes for rich people and corporations. Rich people consumed the same five years ago as they will this year. Tax cuts do not suddenly make a new car affordable for them. What it does is give them more investment income. So, corporations have more working capital, and investors have more money to throw at corporations. This does essentially the opposite of creating jobs. Heck, those corporation may come into a position to achieve their ultimate fantasy....mechanization. Robotics. This would eliminate the need for those messy, expensive, demanding workers.

I'd agree that the definition of a strong economy is one that places more money into the hands of the consumers. Consumers. Not investors. Your hero's decisions are moving our economy in the wrong direction. The average middle-income taxpayers, the ones who are paying the most taxes (all taxes, not just income tax) as a percent of earned income, has his share of the national debt increase created for us by Little Bush. His share of that debt is probably thirty times the tax cut you think he got.

So, time to post a cartoon, or look up a new word in your thesaurus (that's not a type of dinosauer) to use as an insult.

Very very clever remark about the Dems wanting the economy to fail. Brilliant. Makes me take back all I've said about you. Anybody that is so insightful as to take the position that half our nation wants to destroy America, well, I'm just going to believe everything you say from here on out.

Hey Tech. What's the relationship between Reaganomics and Economics? I mean, when the Wealth party gets into the Oval Office under a promise to cut rich peoples' taxes, what happens? Any graphs? I'm sure Mul is right to conclude that this makes for a vibrant economy, but could we just double-check?