[cmccuist]

I'm just going by the Clifford May article.

Granted, it's hard to prove a negative, but the British intelligence is standing by their report. Wilson, who is not a trained field intelligence guy, but is more of a support type, had a rather cavalier attitude about the investigation - until he became a celebrity.

I thought what he had to say was given more weight than it deserved considering his politics and his investigation methods.

To base the whole "Bush LIED!!!" argument on this guy...

I would have been skeptical if the tables were turned and a Republican accused Clinton of fabricating reasons to invade a country. I never did believe the wag-the-dog/tomahawk launch when Monica was testifying. No one could be that ruthless.

Craig