Quote:
Originally posted by fintstone
I didn't say that and you are well aware I didn't so don't try to imply that I did to discredit me.
|
When you say that points you apparently agree on 'have no point' in the context of a thread that
strongly implies yellowcake is a WMD, you're difficult to understand.
Points 1-6 and 7 really negate the whole argument about the importance or timeliness of what 'Iraq was trying to do' so how does this not provide context for the whole issure of the reports; how they were used, and that Bush represented something that clearly did not happen, but only was discussed/attempted, concerning non-threatening materials as a threat?
And setting that aside, the initial article came from that sterling, patriotic source that put American lives in jeopardy -- the very guy who 'outed' V. Plame. Novak would say anything at this point to deflect responsibility from his treasonous act. So I reject Novak as a source.