[Moneyguy1]

Fint

I do not think tech was in any way trying to discredit you.

I too found your logic difficult to follow on the WMD, and although I do not profess to have any knowledge on the construction of nuclear weaponry, it is only a logical step (in my simple mind) to say that a component that has the potential to be used in a weapon is of limited value if the means of constructing the weapon is not available. So, if raw ore is purchased, and highly refined material is required to construct the weapon, and the ability to refine does not exist, then how can the ore be considered dangerous?

I would have been more concerned about back door sales of nuclear weapons from members of the former USSR.

Would a pile of 150 pound rocks outside a castle without a catapult be considered WMD?

Just thinking out loud.