[fintstone]

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
Fint

I too found your logic difficult to follow on the WMD, .......

The original point really had less to do with WMD than the fact that Bush had been called a liar because he had stated that Iraq had attemped to buy radioactive material from Africa. All the "building a weapon" info was just an attempt to divert attention away from the simple fact that the very one accusing the President of lying was the one misrepresenting the facts. Now the liberals are circling the wagons again....just like every other time the "lies" that Bush supposedly told were proven to be true and the person who made the charges turned out to be the liar.

Originally posted by Moneyguy1

Would a pile of 150 pound rocks outside a castle without a catapult be considered WMD?

Just thinking out loud.

If someone piled 150 lbs of rock outside my castle with the intent to build a catpult and launch them at me and my family...I would be pretty darn annoyed with them...even if their efforts to build that catapult failed. In fact, I don't suspect I would wait till the catapult was completed to do something about it. If he were indeed successful, it could be too late.