[304065]

Superman: the trouble with just blindly forwarding emails is that you end up passing on a lot of garbage that doesn't contribute to the debate.

What you have posted is a collection of non-sequiturs: things that are not logically juxtaposed, or even related to the same fundamental issue.

If you want to debate reproductive rights, then why don't you take a position, one way or the other, about the constitutionality of Roe v. Wade. We can go back and explore the preceding cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, talk about the "penumbra rights doctrine," go all the way back to early theories of "quickening" to try and identify the fundamental issue that divides our thinking.

If you want to debate increased regulation of MNC's, with regard to labor practices, environmental policies, the "Sullivan Principles" or outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, why don't you thoughtfully do so?

If you want to attack Christianity, or the Catholic Church's views with regard to birth control, you are free to do THAT, also.

Let me clue you in to something else: the real reason that Limbaugh became, and remains popular, and you aren't going to like this, is that he is FUNNY! He makes fun of the STRIDENCY, the self-righteousness, the omnipresent morality and foibles of the Left!

If you tune in, you will find that most of what he says is intended to AMUSE! (And don't tell me you guys don't tune in. You KNOW you tune in.)

But this list of non-sequiturs, well, it's just a reiteration of the same old "Bush Lied" stuff, not particularly thoughtful, and not FUNNY, whether I agree with the intent or not!