Pretty big claims for a guy who's already told us he would spend 3 trillion (3,000,000,000,000) dollars.
Some of you guys are okay with this income redistribution. "Sounds good so far. We take from the 14%, give it to the 40%" I'm not in that 14% bracket, but that doesn't mean I want their money taken away to pay for some government program. The top 10% of tax payers in this country pay for over 62% of the federal income tax already. Cutting taxes has been proven to stimulate the economy. If you don't believe it, look up the actual statistics. The last 14 months have seen the higest period of growth in 20 years! That's an indisputable fact.
What's happened here is that President Bush took every issue possible away from the democrats. He let Ted Kennedy write the Education bill. He signed a prescription drug benefit. He created the Dept. of Homeland Security (which Joe Leiberman helped to push). He helped Faith-Based Charities with the CARE act. He's also the ONLY president to give funding to _stem cell research_, which the lefties are so fond of these days.
The dems picked him becuase he's a 'war hero'. Funny, he's a 'war hero' for a war they thought was 'unjust' and 'illegal'. He earned three purple hearts and some other medals, which he used to get out of his service after only 4 months. Then immediately upon returning to the US, he claims to have committed war atrocities, and that the soldiers around him committed the same crimes. So he becomes an anti-war activitist and throws these medals over the fence at the white house. Those are the medals he's so proud of now. Now this 'war hero' of a war they called 'unjust' and 'illegal' wants to be in charge of a situation that they'd like everyone to believe is another vietnam?
The facts show that this guy (based on his 19 year voting record in the senate, which nobody wants to recognize) is the NUMBER ONE most liberal man in the senate. He voted against every single weapons system that we are currently using to defeat terrorism. He votes to raise taxes at every opportunity. Looking strictly at the facts of his voting record, he's raised them over 350 times. You can read the detailed list of every vote Here:
http://www.georgewbush.com/media/kerryhighertaxes.pdf
Do I even need to spend the time recounting his votes for and against the war on terror? His COMPLETE turn-around on position on WMD in iraq?
I challenge one person to make an argument that Kerry would be better for the war on Terror.