|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,167
|
What he pwd said.
I'll add. . .
i think that Honda is positioned better, than sub', for pulling off a performance image. (Motorcycles, F1 motors . .. lots of money spent on NSX.
Sub has some good engineering, IMO . .. and has had it for a while. Smart configurations (AWD/Turbo, boxer motors, good ground clearance. ..)
However,my perception is that subaru cuts corners (so to speak) in the construction/manufacturing side. (needed for price-point, I know)
So, while the WRX may be a blast to drive, like rocket . . . but like a rocket, its fun, burns-up, thrown away.
"Performance" (from a 911-centric perspective) means; it goes like hell, fun . . .for 20-30 years.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong.
Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth.
More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee.
|