Quote:
Originally posted by araine901
As big as michale moore is it would ne hard for him to NOT be all over everything.
Maybe someone could clear some stuff up for me. In F/911 he eludes to some pretty damning stuff but never directly says this is this or that is that. Correct me if I am wrong. Like Bush and Bin Laden are buddies etc.
Now here is my take, Did he not do enough research to connect all the dots? Why does he stop short of drawing conclusions. Was he lazy in his research or did he not find a solid link on matters to make a direct statement. I am sure he would give up a year supply of twinkies and french fires with gravy to prove Bush the great satan.
|
According to Moore, I think there was some relationship between Bush and some of Bin Laden's relatives. Moore has stated Bush flew a lot of Saudis out of the U.S. directly after 9/11.
As for his research, who knows? As far as F9/11 being a good documentary, the jury is out on that one. What makes a good piece of non-fiction is an ability to present both sides of an issue, and evidentially, Moore failed to do that. I say evidentially, because I have not seen the film.