[bryanthompson]

uhh, i watched the whole interiew with her and it he was not ripping her apart. He compared the bush's to the Kennedy's and Baldwin types, with the underlying concept that these people have no consequences for their actions. That plants the idea that bush did things that were wrong and hasn't faced the consequences, which you lefties would agree with.

At the very end he read a passage, which were a set of events and time periods, but without direct connections... "air force enacts drug testing... then bush went awol... 6 months later he's back on the records". She even admitted that she put those out there without stating the conclusions she wants the reader to draw. Why would you indirectly do that unless you had no foundation? If she had the facts and real dirt, she could say specifically what she wanted to, and maybe even have credibility (hah!).

She cites 'anonymous sources' all the time. Hey, i'm anonymous source, i saw al gore humping a goat during his trip through Nebraska.