Calling in your observations is a waste of time. The WSP is the biggest gang on hypocritical lying bastards I've ever met. They exist as wilful enforcers to a traffic code which makes a mockery of law and justice. They lazily set up massive anti-speeder operations in places with artificially low speed limits, knowing that most people do 70 there because it's a 6 lane straight chunk of highway. Meanwhile, mere blocks away, ricers run over school-children while racing on a weekly basis, and the so-called "traffic safety enforcement"
can't be bothered to show up because "there's not a whole lot of ticket-writing in it, and besides, it's a county road -- we'd have to coordinate with the county sherriff to enforce there." (Yes, that's a quote from and actual WSP, I am not making this up; the officer in question told a number of gruesome stories about these accidents, and how awful of a place it was. When queried as to why he didn't enforce at that site, he gave the above response. Sick.)
In this state, the officer is not required to show up to a contested hearing -- even if subpoenaed, and despite the recent US Supreme Court case of Crawford v Washington demonstrating the clear unconstitutionality of this practice. In this state, the government is not required to prosecute any traffic case against you -- the judge, the impartial arbiter of justice, will see to that important role. In this state, if you appeal your case, the government is not required to file an answering brief, defend their position at the appeal hearing, or acknowledge any communication. In short, you are guilty until proven innocent, on the word of one man.
Further, in this state, a police officer is not required to have any demonstrable training on the use of radar SMDs. The requirement is more simple: "That the officer be able to adequately use radar SMDs in the pursuit of traffic enforcement." How can you tell if the officer can adequately use the gear if there's no training and no test? The radar is required to be calibrated, but the calibration record sheets are as likely forged as not, and the with any luck, the radar unit itself has had a number of unexplained entries on the maintenance record. "Antenna full of water; drained; bench-tested sat." followed by several months of "intermittent error; could not duplicate."
So Jeff -- good on ya for trying to enforce upon the enforcers, but this state is so far gone it isn't even worth your effort. Your next best bet is to try and figure out which elected officials have what positions on traffic enforcement -- but good luck on that venue, they all parrot about the same position.
Dan