Quote:
Originally posted by CamB
Just remember that while you see Kerry "spin and lies" about the rationale for war, I see Bush's spin and lies about the rationale for war. Maybe the true position of both candidates is in the middle.
. . .
I think I see the problem though - what you're saying is that Kerry is misrepresenting the current situation (to his own gain). I put it to you that he is not worse than Bush in this respect.
|
This seems to be a kee-jerk response, now. "any negative, which Kerry has; Bush must be said to be worse"
No doubt, the Bush team spins. . .but there is a HUGE difference.
Kerry habitually throws out the baby with the bathwater. His whole power-base comes from magnifying ANYTHING that can be spun as "US bad . .bad US, bad"
Bush is just the opposite. He looks for the good, and trys to celebrate it. When he see bad, he is terribly uncomfortable with it. (lib's leveraging this always) He wants any problems fixed immediately, so they don't cloud the possitive.
Kerry; "wrong war, wrong time, . . .they told stories of cutting off ears .. . our Iraq military weaknesses are troops without the body armor that they need. . ..10,000 out of 12,000 Humvees have no armor., bla bla bla . . ."
All such that dumb-ass suckers will conclude
'oh, tough constructive critisism . . .kerry must be the one who really cares' . . when infact, it's the one, the only, game Kerry has to play.
Kerry is disgustingly one dimensional. I would rather have the witch Hillary, than that simpleton. (that's how bad kerry is)
edit-spelling; it's getting late here.