|
Personally I think Steve's comments were somewhat over the top. I do not think that Paul's daughter looks any different than many of the young women of this generation. I can think of several ad campaigns and several women rock stars that have a similar look. The real question is does the look equate to behavior which is not acceptable to your morals as a parent. I agree that tatoos are out for under 18, because of their permanent nature, but piercings, who cares. Women used to be tramps if they had multiple piercings in their ears. And as far as what they dress like or what color hair they have, again if it does not affect who they are inside or your morals as a parent, WHO CARES. Parents who try to over parent in these subjects can actually do much more harm than good. Love your children for who they are are on the inside, that is what really counts. The outside appearance is (absent tatoos) temporary and definately subject to change. Don't get attached to any one "style."
__________________
**********************
Bill Smoak
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul!
|