Quote:
Originally posted by bryanthompson
The whole Rush thing pisses me off. It's a matter principle and constitutional rights. He _has_ the right to privacy with his medical records. he hasnt been charged of anything, he admitted his drug problem, and he's cleaned himself up. Look at the rediculous amounts of work it takes to release a medical record. When I was trying to get into the military, every page had a disclosure warning, and I had to make sure that whatever I put could be made available to the gov't.
As a matter of principle, Why would a drug addict go to get help if they're going to be investigated or charged with a crime when they do so? Shouldn't addicts be encouraged to do exactly what he did? You go after the dealers and crooked doctors, not the addicts.
|
Not under the new Patriot Act or the new TIA databases.
Soon everyone will be shaken until some criminal element comes out. What are you?
Enemy of the state, terrorist sympathizer, dissenter, MP3 downloader, copied VHS tapes illegally, have unlicensed software on CDR, drugs with no prescription, browser cookies Ashcroft don't like?