http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13313-2004Oct6.html
What I really want to know is if you see this as credible evidence that perhaps Hans Blix was right, and that the weapons inspectors should have been allowed to do their job.
I seem to remember Iraq throwing out a massive pile of evidence they had destroyed their WMD, and the US/UK saying "no you haven't".
Yes they have.
If you want to wage pre-emptive war you have to take the consequences. Seems that the criticism now is one of those consequences, as is the cost, the death toll, etc...