Quote:
Originally posted by Superman
Oh, that's right. I almost forgot. KILL THEM ALL. .. ..
|
Hey, I know that lib's, like you think that the world is over populated, but c'mon . .. let's not get extreme.
Did you read the article?
IT SAYS: "The U.S. military said the "precision strike" had hit a safe-house being used by the network of Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi at 1:15 a.m. Friday.
"Credible intelligence sources confirmed Zarqawi leaders were meeting at the safe-house at the time of the strike," a statement said. "
AND YET YOU FOCUS ON: a hospital doctor said Friday - killed 11 people and wounded 17 at a wedding party.
DID YOU NOT SEE:"The U.S. military said the "precision strike" had hit a safe-house being used by the network of Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi at 1:15 a.m. Friday.
"Credible intelligence sources confirmed Zarqawi leaders were meeting at the safe-house at the time of the strike," a statement said. "
(?)
The crux of your argument is that
it's not a target if there "might be innocent people over there, just trying their best to have a life."
AND, if ANY
"innocent people" get killed, then we have engaged in a
"KILL THEM ALL" stratagy. (yeah, perfect logic)
Geez this is getting old, dealing with your extreme swings and spins.