View Single Post
Overpaid Slacker Overpaid Slacker is offline
Super Jenius
 
Overpaid Slacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 3,491
Send a message via AIM to Overpaid Slacker
Rick -
No. I agree w/ Cramer on the potential EMF issue, but in practicality the DOT/FAA study I'd read a coupla years back (which I can't find right now, but I'll post when I can) said there had been no instances of cell phones screwing with avionics. OK, there had been instances of screwy things happening to avionics sometimes when cell phones were in use, but no causative factors.

It's an economics game -- both by the airlines and by the cell service providers. Airlines get to charge you to make a call on their phones, so surprise there, right? But, as importantly, the cell service providers get their billing straight. When passengers in small aircraft use cell phones (not illegal) especially very fast small aircraft, the cells cannot accurately track the "hand-offs" of the calls as the phone is covering many cells and moving quickly from cell to cell -- which screws up the billing/tracking ability of the service providers. Before some EE out there gores me for the rudimentary explanation, I'm relating the result of a few articles I'd read years ago, so take it as a crude expansion of Cramer's "line of sight" example.

JP
__________________
2003 SuperCharged Frontier ../.. 1979 930 ../.. 1989 BMW 325iX ../.. 1988 BMW M5 ../.. 1973 BMW 2002 ../..1969 Alfa Boattail Spyder ../.. 1961 Morris Mini Cooper ../..2002 Aprilia RSV Mille ../.. 1985 Moto Guzzi LMIII cafe ../.. 2005 Kawasaki Brute Force 750

Last edited by Overpaid Slacker; 10-26-2004 at 09:13 AM..
Old 10-26-2004, 09:09 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)