View Single Post
roadtrp204 roadtrp204 is offline
Registered
 
roadtrp204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Boulder City, NV, USA
Posts: 339
Garage
Post

I have a 2.0L in my 914 with stock heads and valve train, aftermarket FI, and will have 96mm P/L's (engine is waiting on body work, so I don't have real time experience yet with all the new configurations). I asked your same question after making a wrong decision on cams and the response was that the Webcam 86 works well for an unmodified engine (heads, rods, and valve train). Power range is from 2500 to 5500, which isn't pushing the components out of their designed rpm range. The 86a and above cams require considerations to head flow and engine rpm abilities to reach their full potential.

------------------
Chris
75 914 2.0L
Old 05-11-2001, 05:47 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)