[dd74]

Jim - everything you wrote involving creationism is inferred and subjective. Evolution is not inferred; it is scientific, it is deductive, it happened and continues to happen today. Explain off as some master plan of an almighty how humans have grown in width and height exponentially within the last two-hundred years. If we were created, why do we "evolve?" It can't be a combination of both because Christian doctrine does not allow such. "Create" as a defined word, suggests finites. Creations "exist" but don't evolve, yet we are evolving.

Needless to say, despite clarifying your point, I still perceive in your words that you look down on those who place fish with anything but a cross inside the outline on the rear-ends of their cars. That's bad polarized Christian practice. You know why? Because you're saying that practioners of Darwinism refute God entirely. But then you side-step that to say many scientists are Christians. Hence, I don't know what you're saying, really. Your argument isn't adding up.

Oh, and no one's going to tell me Bush and Christianity aren't fond bedfellows intent on pushing agenda in the world. Too distinctly I remember the words: "You're either with us, or against us." Now why shouldn't any Christian, knowing their president is of the same religious ilk, choose to not believe God spoke to him and said: "Dubya, go take over the world and push me through to the forefront?" You'd be against what your president has told you is "the word of God," and in that, against God himself?

Or did Bush consult some other God who isn't the principle Christian God? If so, I think GW's breaking a commandment; which is punishable by...what? Burning? Dunking? Stoning?