Timely discussion, this. Tho' we've veered off into other topics (which is all good) we've been discussing global warming and someone (I'm too lazy to go back and look) asked for some of the data.
Well, turns out a recent article (which I'll get to in a sec) provided the link for one of the articles I was referring to. So
here 'tis.
Now, I understand (and partially empathize with) the skepticism surrounding having those with commercial interests in the results of research conducting the research itself-- but it's a fact of life. However, do not delude your good selves by believing that academics and professional scientists will not and do not spin data for their own ends. Remember, these guys' prestige, grants and careers depend upon maintaining whatever theory it is that quite literally pays their bills. The gravitas of being an Important, Concerned Person in these areas can't be overstated for professional advancement. There is no necessary purity in the motives (and therefore the methods) of academic research.
So, when talking about Arctic warming, one crucial question becomes:
Who Defines the Arctic?
Enjoy.
JP