[lendaddy]

Would also like to add. Those against going to war in the first place were not arguing the absence of WMD's, they argued Saddam would not use them, or that they were contained, or that we had no moral authority to attack based on the simple "presence of WMD's, etc.... Fine, these are debatable positions. But to pretend "any idiot should have known he didn't have WMD's" as if it were your initial position against the war is laughable.

Now that it appears he may not have had them you guys jump on with the 8 year old tactic of "nanner nanner nanner, you were wrong, nanner nanner nanner"

I guess "grow up" is my reply.