|
You could be against the war and not *know* (whatever that means) that there were WMD. I could have assumed that Iraq *did* have WMDs and I still would have been against the war. Why? Well, sane people do risk/reward analysis. Some people might think that a stable secular (albeit whack) leader in a contained situation would be better than an invasion and the highly probably resulting anarchy. Then again, I wasn't taking into account the potential economic gains by American companies for "rebuilding" or the oil reserves. Silly me...
|