[M.D. Holloway]

OK, I think we got a little off my original thread of ‘Nonsense the at the Learned Believed’. That’s OK - kinda fun reading the rants and points.

Here is a chance to show yo chops! I have a challenge for ya‘ll - for those with the nut bag that is!
I have written two statements (A & B), one of which is true and meaningful the other is nonsense and meaningless. Which one is which! Can you prove your point? Have fun lads: May the games begin…

A) No other relative terms seem to serve, for they name relations that may hold between persons and another kind of thing, or between things that are not persons at all. Although spatial relations may hold between persons, they may hold between almost any two things; so they cannot distinctively characterize persons.

B) The experience of rationalization should teach us not to underestimate the ability of totalitarian or authoritarian regimes in which expertise is the difference in quality and can be brought about through many lengths. By thinking that a quasi-euphoric cultural and creative consciousness lives in an actively polygot world, the world becomes morphed into, once again, irreversibility in the sense that only the accustomed beliefs depend on little if any state of being.


This is gonna be tricky! Don't let my spelling errors influence your choice. What you may think is nonsense may not be, or is it?