|
Hum, I always thought the 2nd was there because of the fear of a federal goverment being tyrannical and that the right of individual states to raise a armed militia was so the people in the state could defend themselves against an organised federal force.
So, from that perspective, yes I would argue that states can regulate which arms individuals can own. We control the state by the election process, not by an armed rabble attacking your state national guard.
So which guns do I think individuals can't have. Assault weapons, machine guns and handguns.
Those to keep. Hunting rifles, shotguns. For self defense, nothing quite like a good shogun
__________________
steve
old rocket inguneer
|