[SLO-BOB]

Originally posted by stomachmonkey
Dude not again, cruising the net is probably one of the least intensive things that you can do with any computer and does not heavily task them at all. It's by no means a benchmark to use to compare any computers.
I totally agree. That's why I said it would be foolish to spend the kind of money it takes to buy even the cheapest ibook when any windows computer, even a Celeron, would work fine. Better yet, heshould just get a better e-mail provider-for free.

Some sites require plug ins that you have to hunt for to make a Mac work? That's the biggest load of BS I've heard.
So prove me wrong and name them. Cause I've yet to come across a site that required an additional plug-in download on my Mac.
Yeah-that's exactly what you said last time we discussed this. Then I said "Kazaa". Then you said "They suck anyway" Then I said "That's not the point is it?"
I named one, and in my experience there are others including any site that requires Windows Media Player. I didn't write them down and since I ditched my Mac, I haven't had to worry about it. I'm not making this stuff up. It's based on REAL experience from having owned a flaming piece of crap for just about a year. Do we really need to do this again? Let see-Emachine that works great-$600 vs Ibook that smokes a logic board every 6 weeks $1500. To me it's a no brainer.


Scott