[KevinP73]

Originally posted by bryanthompson
Sure, the constitution applies to everyone. I just think in such glaringly obvious situations as this, the media can call him what he is. there is no doubt about what this guy did. There's no point in putting up the charade. If he hadnt been shot, put him on trial, give him a fair one, and go through all of those steps. But there's no reason for us to pretend that this guy didn't do what we can clearly see.

In all fairness nobody here or even on the video coverage actually saw him steal the car. Maybe he just borrowed from his crack head cousin who was really the one who stole it. That would make him "in posession" of a stolen car but not actually a car thief.