Quote:
Originally posted by vash
nice try skip. completely different scenario. lemme know if you need me to draw you a picture. 
MJ case = orange
this effed up case = apple
|
NO PICTURES!
(if you're talking about MJ. )
Just to clarify... My reference to MJ was about how some were arguing that the "court" had "spoken", regarding MJ's guilt or innocence (i.e. his actions were bizarre, not criminal - see verdict). I made the case in that other thread that sometimes the courts get it wrong... as it sounds they did in this one.
Definitely apples and oranges... but it's still courts. Or, something like that.
And, I'm not a true Texan. Born and raised in the Fla. But, we gots Old Sparky down yonder.
- Skip