|
Clear this up...
After the "outing" wasn't it found that if anyone had done it, it was Wilson and Plame themselves? One of those "worst kept secrets" that everyone knew about.
Didn't the CIA address Plames position as being "operative" by job label only; not a spy, but someone who handles class material. Didn't they also clarify that her position didn't allow the "treasonous outing" to apply, plus reasonably common knowledge of her position would negate the "outing" as poor judgement at best?
Didn't the 9/11 commission find evidence that the yellowcake thing was legit and that Wilson either flubbed or covered up his finding?
Didn't the prosecutor in the case publically state the Rove was not the focus of their case?
|