Your link makes two points:
1 - "This argument has nothing to do with whether or not evolution is a viable theory." Yup, I concur, made that point one post up, thanks. Why do you insist on fighting it? By suggesting that dinosaurs and humans coexisted, I'm not making an argument for creation, for a young earth, even for a God. I'm simply suggesting that the evidence certainly supports dinosaurs existing on an increasingly smaller scale up until the middle ages. This is 100% compatible with evolution.
2 - "Paluxy doesn't stand up to examination." Well, I beg to differ, and there's a lot of other evidence for it besides Paluxy. The Paluxy find is actually pretty strong, but it's really only one piece in a much bigger puzzle. I won't repost evidence from the other thread, simply because this difference isn't worth the effort. If you insist on believe the TO-guy, ok, more power to you, it has no effect on any other belief. It's an isolated deal. It's just that we keep coming back to the idea that dinosaurs and humans should have coexisted, and some of you keep saying, "No, we all know they didn't."
