Quote:
Originally posted by skipdup
Think how many "theories", which were tightly held by "a vast majority of" scientists, were later disproved.
|
In truth, evolution is no longer a theory. It can be demonstrated in the lab. DNA sequencing can illustrate chromosomal adaptations in a precise way. How evolution applies to the origin of man
is theory. Gaps in the fossil record and other areas of knowledge lead to lively debate among scientists. I have no idea why evolution itself is still referred to as a theory as it is so easily demonstrated in controlled laboratory conditions.
Why some Christians insist on a literal interpretation of every sentence in the bible baffles me. I am aware of no preamble in the bible that claims perfect precision regarding the historical and scientific record. The vast majority of books in the bible were lost or edited along the way. Constantine tossed out great volumes of biblical verse for political expediency and King James's legacy is that of an editor, not a monarch.
Is it truly necessary to believe that Noah sailed with a pair of kangaroos and polar bears? If you do not, are you no longer a Christian?
It should not be a soul wrenching endeavor to reconcile scientific discovery and religious dogma. The bible seems more suited to the role of "spiritual guide" than "scientific authority".